Contáctenos: 4786-3333 / 4371-8682 | [email protected]
Contáctenos: 4786-3333 / 4371-8682 | [email protected]

Investigación, Desarrollos y Material de Consulta

Home/Investigación, Desarrollos y Material de Consulta

Categorías

Todos los documentos

305, 2018

Conclusión Tesis de Maestría en Estudios Organizacionales UDESA 2017.

By |mayo 3rd, 2018|Categories: Contenidos de interés, Pymes en Crecimiento, Profesionalización de la PyME|Comentarios desactivados en Conclusión Tesis de Maestría en Estudios Organizacionales UDESA 2017.

Por Facundo Penna

         Información Contextual

  1. Pregunta de investigación: ¿Cómo conduce la empresa la segunda generación de la familia fundadora?
  2. Investigación realizada desde 2009 a 2017.
  3. Metodología de Investigación: Cualitativa inspirada en enfoque Etnográfico 

    DesarrolloEl actor principal del caso conduce su PYME aprehendiendo. Esta sería la respuesta a la pregunta de investigación si tuviera que expresarlo en una sola frase. El concepto aprehensión que empleo es el concepto filosófico de la palabra, en particular de la filosofía de Kant:

    “La palabra aprehensión ha sido también usada, aunque con una significación especial, por Kant en su Crítica de la Razón pura. Para Kant, la aprehensión consiste en un acto de la imaginación para abrazar y coordenar en una sola imagen o en una concepción única los elementos diversos de la intuición sensible (color, extensión etc.), en el supuesto de que toda sensación es una síntesis. Pero como Kant distingue en el conocimiento sensible la materia y la firma, aquélla referida a la impresión y ésta a las formas intelectuales del espacio y del tiempo, establece una clase de aprehensión para cada uno de estos dos elementos, o sea la aprehensión a posteriori de nociones empíricas y la aprehensión a priori o síntesis pura de la aprehensión, que nos suministra los conceptos racionales de las matemáticas”

    Cómo acto de síntesis, podría decirse que es un proceso evolutivo, continuo, dialéctico, reflexivo individual y colectivo.

    El objetivo de la investigación era encontrar una respuesta al qué y al cómo una dueña PYME conduce su empresa.

    Ambas respuestas tendrán las características del proceso de aprehensión. En cuanto a las funciones, estas son las que el tipo de autoridad (Penna y Solymossy, 2000) mediado por sus características vinculares (familia, amistades, etc) y culturales, a lo largo de su evolución le permitió ejercer en función de la evolución de sus capacidades (reconocidas y valoradas por el mismo sistema).

    Para la actora principal las actividades hasta llegar a la conducción general fueron tangenciales al centro de la empresa (en términos de Jacques ejerció las funciones de apoyo y funciones de la asociación): inició por Comercio Exterior, añadió Contabilidad, Administración, Legales, Personal, Operaciones, Postventa y ahora Comercial y Marketing y la Gerencia General.

    Durante el proceso de agregado de funciones, la entrevistada fue aprehendiendo distintos niveles de la realidad de la organización, del negocio, del contexto y de la asociación (Penna y Solymossy) y encontrándose con dificultades y conflictos productos de la intención de realizar cambios que la fueron llevando a tener que incorporar actividades que le permitan lograr un entendimiento que contemple al menos en primera instancia una dimensión histórica del sistema organizacional.

    Esta aprehensión es el resultado de procesos que la entrevistada voluntariamente integra y podría decirse también que son el resultado del ejercicio de las cinco disciplinas del aprendizaje propuestas por Senge.

    Los procesos son todas las actividades que la entrevistada realiza para “estar al tanto de las novedades”: los mecanismos formales de coordinación, las distintas formas a través de las cuales ejecuta las prácticas de liderazgo gerencial (Jacques, 2000 –J16-) y su misma actividad directa sobre las funciones. Procesos (los mecanismos de coordinación) que como evidencia el caso no han sido incorporados en los sectores donde quien conducía era su padre, sino que por el contrario las personas de esos sectores se manifiestan reacias declarativamente o en los hechos a pesar de que desde los dichos se comprometían a realizar los cambios propuestos en la forma de actuar.

    La forma cómo ejecuta estos procesos está determinada por la elección de aquellas actividades que siente funcionales a ampliar y enriquecer su aprehensión de la realidad personal, colectiva y contextual. Estas actividades son la observación y el dialogo (que en el caso devienen en discusiones y conflictos) de modelos de conducción vinculares (sus padres) y de la experiencia (su anterior experiencia laboral), su formación y la apertura (al exterior para conocer qué y cómo suceden otras realidades semejantes) y la asesoría. El caso muestra que en la combinación de estas distintas fuentes de referencia la entrevistada practica una forma diferente a la primitiva y original de la empresa, y cómo esta forma de trabajar impresa en los actores desde los inicios choca y discute sin poder dialogar.

    En una función de integración y diálogo de las actividades anteriores la entrevistada ubica su actividad de astrología y tarot como espacio en el que éstos procesos dialogan, discuten y se retroalimentan (la entrevistada habla de llevar un tema de un lado hacia el otro).

    En el caso de estudio, la conductora sintetiza/ integra las actividades que Mintzberg se empeño en discriminar: el pensamiento estratégico y la programación estratégica y se comporta contraria a la descripción que el autor realiza en cuanto a las elecciones sobre las actividades. Casandra no privilegia la oralidad por sobre la escritura ni la reflexión por sobre acción a pesar de que para el sistema cultural desde el cual la empresa fue creada: “Casandra pretende conducir como dicen los libros”

    En esta aprehensión que significa la conducción, la conductora fue incrementando sus niveles de comprensión sobre los hechos, pudiendo llegar a visualizar y explicitar patrones de conducta y el entramado de estructuras conscientes en el padre pero actuadas (sin saber si conscientes o tácitas) en las personas que se formaron laboralmente él, de ésta forma la Quinta Disciplina pareciera tener en la conductora de la empresa un representante pero que no logra hasta ahora obtener resultados positivos de su aplicación sino parcialmente. Cuando me refiero a resultados positivos no hago mención a los resultados económicos y financieros de la empresa sino a cuestiones vinculadas con la realización personal, la calidad de vida en el trabajo y en la vida, etc.

    Este entendimiento de la realidad es lo que está compartiendo con su equipo de profesionalización y sus dirigidos con la intención de disminuir el grado de conflictividad (entre dos culturas) e inercia con la que vienen los sectores que eran conducidos por el padre con el objetivo de sostener la empresa en el tiempo para lo cual es necesario atravesar la transformación organizacional con el deseo de no dejar la vida en el intento.

    La entrevistada intenta conducir de una forma parecida o en línea a la propuesta por la Quinta Disciplina. El espacio de actuación de mayor comodidad es el equipo de profesionalización. En ese espacio ella comparte su entendimiento de la realidad personal, de las personas individualmente, de la organización como conjunto, del estadio y el momento de la empresa y del contexto. Oficia de diseñadora organizacional, actividad que desde años realizaba cuando su padre estaba en vida, pero con los límites que éste le imponía. A lo largo de todo el caso, existen evidencias para comprender que la conducción para ella es una cuestión colectiva y colaborativa, donde el diálogo es fundamental y el lenguaje es crítico. En esa comprensión radica su mayor preocupación dado que se encuentra en una soledad incomprendida e insatisfecha que puede ser explicada desde la teoría de la transición (Penna y Solymossy, 2001). La autoridad carismática entiende la conducción como una cuestión de adhesión y seguimiento a un lider salvador, en éste sentido entender la conducción de forma colectiva sería un sin sentido (Bion, 1961).

    Como conclusión, la actora principal conduce su PYME desarrollando actividades, en función de sus capacidades, en la organización y en la asociación, de un proceso sistémico (cultural) cuyos insumos son la observación, la formación, la práctica y la asesoría comprendidas en una dinámica de diálogo (integración y retroalimentación) de actividades de un orden superior (astrología y tarot) para la sustentabilidad de la empresa.

205, 2018

Lectura Recomendada: Teaching smart people how to learn. Autor: Chris Argyris

By |mayo 2nd, 2018|Categories: Contenidos de interés|Comentarios desactivados en Lectura Recomendada: Teaching smart people how to learn. Autor: Chris Argyris

Puede descargar el documento AQUI

301, 2017

Cómo mejorar la ética en su Organización

By |enero 3rd, 2017|Categories: Contenidos de interés|Tags: , , , , , , , , , |Comentarios desactivados en Cómo mejorar la ética en su Organización

Título original: What You Can Do to Improve Ethics at Your Company

Fuente: Harvard Business Review

Autores: Christopher Mclaverty y Annie McKee

Link a la nota

What You Can Do to Improve Ethics at Your Company

Enron. Wells Fargo. Volkswagen. It’s hard for good, ethical people to imagine how these meltdowns could possibly happen. We assume it’s only the Ken Lays and Bernie Madoffs of the world who will cheat people. But what about the ordinary engineers, managers, and employees who designed cars to cheat automotive pollution controls or set up bank accounts without customers’ permission? We tell ourselves that we would never do those things. And, in truth, most of us won’t cook the books, steal from customers, or take that bribe.

But, according to a study by one of us (Christopher) of C-suite executives from India, Colombia, Saudi Arabia, the U.S., and the U.K., many of us face an endless stream of ethical dilemmas at work. In-depth interviews with these leaders provide some insight and solutions that can help us when we do face these quandaries.

We were surprised that 30 leaders in the study recalled a total of 87 “major” ethical dilemmas from their career histories. Over 50 had occurred in the course of the last five years. Another surprise was how few of the incidents were caused by bribery, corruption, or anti-competition issues (only 16% of all ethical dilemmas mentioned). More often the dilemmas were the result of competing interests, misaligned incentives, clashing cultures.

Based on this study and our collective experience of working with thousands of business leaders, there are a number of obstacles and contradictions we see most often impact the ability to act ethically:

  • Business transformation programs and change management initiatives. Companies can warp their own ethical climate by pushing too much change from the top, too quickly and too frequently. Leaders in the study reported having to implement staff reduction targets, dispose of big businesses in major markets, and lead mergers and acquisitions. Some of these activities included inherent conflicts of interest; others simply caused leaders to have to act counter to their values (loyalty, for example). Many leaders felt poorly prepared for the dilemmas they faced and felt compelled to take decisions they later regretted.
  • Incentives and pressure to inflate achievement of targets. People do what they are rewarded to do, and most leaders are rewarded for hitting targets. Take Wells Fargo as an example: Managers were rewarded for the number of accounts they opened and managed. As a result, apparently, many felt driven to open accounts that customers didn’t request or approve. The lure of incentives are a problem in boardrooms too: Bonus payments and executive share schemes are often based on short-term business metrics, which can be counter to long-term success.
  • Cross-cultural differences. Most leaders in the study reflected on how rapidly their businesses had globalized over the last 10 years and how ethical issues can be profoundly difficult when operating across different cultures. They talked about how challenging it was to decide whose cultural “rules” were paramount when making business decisions. They gave examples like closing a sales office in Japan, breaking a verbal promise made during after-work drinks in China, or ignoring “sleeping” business partners in a Saudi Arabian deal, all of which have cultural and ethical components.

While these obstacles stand in the way of making ethical decisions, they aren’t insurmountable. Here’s what we learned from the leaders in the study about what worked for them in improving the ethical climate in their organizations:

Know where you stand
The senior leaders in the study told us that, in contrast to what corporate compliance officers would like us to believe, their organizations’ codes of conduct and ethics training wasn’t particularly helpful when it came to managing ethical dilemmas. Rules and regulations often don’t cover the majority of ethical issues, especially those around people and resource trade-offs. Even the law, they said, is limited as it’s usually geared to big transgressions.

Instead, you need to understand what matters to you. Companies become ethical one person at a time, one decision at a time. If you don’t know where you stand, or if you can’t accurately read your organization’s underlying culture, you’ll find yourself blowing in the wind (at best). Emotional intelligence can help you here. Self-awareness enables you to build and strengthen that inner compass. Organizational awareness enables you to identify the forces in your company’s culture and processes that could drive you and others to do the wrong thing. You also need emotional self-control: it takes courage to step away from the crowd and do the right thing.

Learn what really matters in your organization
To be prepared to challenge the unwritten rules of your organization — and the systems that support them — you need to learn to listen to weak signals about what the organization truly values. There will usually be lip service to doing the right thing, but what happens in practice? You can, for example, pay more attention to:

  • How people are paid. Does your compensation scheme reward the right things? Is the focus on short-term results or long-term sustainable success? Are the right staff included? Long-term schemes should include shop floor workers, supervisory staff, and different demographic groups. This ensures that the entire workforce is focused on longer-term sustainable goals.
  • Who gets promoted and why. Is there a true meritocracy in your company, or are certain people treated better than others? Are people who reflect on ethical issues, who speak up and challenge accepted ways of doing things, truly valued? Perhaps people are promoted according to unwritten rules that will ensure compliance with the status quo. In an ethical organization, talent management is a transparent and objective process — everyone gets a fair shake.
  • How employees feel about the company. We want to work for businesses we can be proud of. If your engagement surveys show that people don’t trust managers, or that employees are disengaged and ashamed of the company, you might have a widespread ethical problem on your hands.

Build a strong and diverse personal network
According to the study, the most useful resource that leaders have when faced with an ethical dilemma is their own personal network. This provides an informal sounding board and can highlight options and choices that the leader may not have considered. When making ethical decisions, it’s important to recognize that your way isn’t the only way, and that even mandated choices will have consequences that you must deal with.

The challenge is that most leaders have networks full of people who think and act like them and many fail to seek out diverse opinions, especially in highly charged situations. Instead, they hunker down with people who have similar beliefs and values. This can lead to particularly dire consequences in cross-cultural environments.

To overcome this, you need another core emotional intelligence competency, empathy, which allows you to learn how to read others and truly understand what matters to them and what they care about. This will, in turn, help you connect with people and gather their thoughts, opinions, and help when you need them.

Speak up
If, after consulting your network, you believe something’s going wrong, it may be time to be brave and speak up. Leaders in the study repeatedly highlighted the positive consequences of speaking out and at least trying to resolve their ethical dilemmas by remaining true to their own personal values.

If you find you need to speak up, there will be a number of choices to be made. Do you talk to the boss? Consult with peers? Work with advisory functions such as legal, compliance or human resources? You can draw on your personal network for support and guidance on the right way forward within the context of your unique situation.

The leaders in the study were clear about the consequences of taking these actions: increased self-respect, improved confidence in their ability to address future dilemmas, and a more ethical work climate. And perhaps more importantly, taking brave action made them happier at work.

 

112, 2016

Cómo manejar tus emociones sin luchar contra ellas

By |diciembre 1st, 2016|Categories: Contenidos de interés|Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , |Comentarios desactivados en Cómo manejar tus emociones sin luchar contra ellas

Título original: How to Manage your emotions without fighting them

Fuente: Harvard Business Review

Autor: Alicia David

Link al artículo

How to Manage your emotions without fighting them

We often hear tips and tricks for helping us to “control” our emotions, but that’s the wrong idea: strong emotions aren’t bad, and they don’t need to be pushed down or controlled; they are, in fact, data. Our emotions evolved as a signaling system, a way to help us communicate with each other and to better understand ourselves. What we need to do is learn to develop emotional agility, the capacity to mine even the most difficult emotions for data that can help us make better decisions.

What’s the function of the emotion?

To make the most of that data, ask yourself what the function of your emotion is. What is it telling you? What is it trying to signal?

Consider the example of Mikhail, who found himself in a perpetual cycle of stress because of the never-ending onslaught of tasks at work. As he more precisely defined his emotions, he realized what he was feeling wasn’t just stress: he felt a more general dissatisfaction with his work, disappointment in some of his career choices, and anxiety about what the future held for him. Once Mikhail recognized and accepted these emotions, he was able to see what they were signaling to him: he had started to question whether he was on the right career path.

Emotional Intelligence

This revelation meant that instead of tackling a productivity problem—by becoming more disciplined about prioritizing his tasks or saying no to extra work—Mikhail was able to do something much more appropriate and constructive: he began working with a career coach. By examining what his emotions were telling him, rather than pushing them away or focusing on the wrong problem, he learned something new about himself and was eventually able to find a new career path where he was just as busy—but felt much less stressed.

Our emotions can teach us valuable lessons. Let them shine a light on what you want to change, how you want to act in the future, or what is valuable to you.

Is your reaction aligned with your values?

Our emotions can also help us understand our deepest values. They can often signal what is more important to us: You feel love to your family. You feel ambition at work, and appreciate achievement and self-worth. You feel fulfilled when you’ve been able to help a direct report achieve their goals. You feel peace and satisfaction on a mountain summit. It’s far better to focus on these deeper values rather than your immediate emotions, which can spur poor decisions.

Consider this example: let’s say that you need to give some difficult feedback to one of your direct reports. You’re anxious about the conversation and you’ve been putting it off (which just makes you more anxious). In examining your emotions, you realize that one of the values behind your procrastination is fairness. She’s a strong employee, and you just don’t want to be unfair to her. So, you ask yourself, how does having or not having the conversation either bring you toward or move you away from your value of fairness? Looking at the situation in this light, you can see that giving her the feedback and helping her to succeed is actually more fair to her—and to your whole team—than caving to your anxieties. You’ve been able to unhook yourself from the thrall of your immediate emotions in order to make a better choice that is true to the values that underlie them.

This kind of thinking can help you avoid situations in which you do something that helps you feel good in the short term but doesn’t align with your values in the long term. Avoiding a conversation is a typical example, but there are many others: brashly telling someone off for getting on your nerves when you value compassion; sticking with a comfortable job that doesn’t align with your dream of starting a business when you value growth; criticizing yourself for the smallest things when you really value self-affirmation.

Managing emotions isn’t just doing away with them; it’s putting strategies in place that let you use them effectively rather than letting them govern your behaviors and actions. Your emotions are your natural guidance system—and they are more effective when you don’t try to fight them.